PolicyLens

Green - Labour market

Protect pay in transition schemes

Guarantee two years of pay protection for workers moved through publicly supported transition schemes.

Last updated: May 2026.

Read the policy-specific methodology note

Transition scale

The central case covers 100,000 workers a year receiving temporary pay protection during industrial or net-zero transition.

  • CCC estimates 8k-75k job losses from net zero.
  • Central case includes wider industrial transition.
  • Average support is GBP 8,000 per worker.

Core trade-offs

Workers facing transition gain income insurance. Taxpayers or employers pay. If poorly targeted, it can slow necessary reallocation and preserve unviable jobs.

  • Displaced workers gain income support.
  • Taxpayers or employers pay.
  • Bad design slows reallocation.

Illustrative fiscal impact

+GBP 0.1bn to +GBP 3.5bn. Central estimate: +GBP 0.7bn.

  • Positive numbers mean public-finance pressure; negative numbers mean Exchequer savings.
  • Gross costs are separated from tax, NI and benefit offsets.
  • Private business costs are not automatically fiscal costs.
  • Behavioural responses widen the range materially.
  • This is not an official costing.

Economic impact by 2027-28

  • Jobs: Protects incomes, not jobs; may delay movement from declining sectors.
  • Wages: Maintains earnings temporarily for selected transition workers.
  • Prices: Small aggregate effect unless levies or regulated prices fund it.
  • GDP / productivity: Likely negative if unconditional; better if tied to retraining and viable jobs.

Assessment

Pay protection can reduce hardship during transition, but it is not automatically pro-growth. The economic case depends on whether it speeds retraining into productive jobs or delays adjustment in declining sectors.

Confidence: Low. The exposed workforce is uncertain and depends on industrial-transition policy design.

Main risks

  • Reallocation delay: Pay protection can keep labour in low-productivity or declining activities.
  • Eligibility pressure: More sectors may claim transition status once support exists.
  • Regional lock-in: Support may preserve jobs where future demand is weak.

Safeguards

  • Tie support to retraining milestones.
  • Publish eligible sectors and expiry dates.
  • Evaluate earnings after support ends.

Academic evidence

Acemoglu and Restrepo, Journal of Political Economy, 2020

Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets

Automation can displace tasks and workers even when it raises output in some firms.

Supports caution on AI rules that trade protection against productivity.

Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets (2020)

Autor, Kerr and Kugler, Economic Journal, 2007

Does Employment Protection Reduce Productivity?

Employment-protection changes can reduce productivity where firms face higher firing and adjustment costs.

Supports caution on policies that raise dismissal, scheduling or adjustment costs.

Does Employment Protection Reduce Productivity? (2007)

UK government evidence

Climate Change Committee, 2023

A Net Zero workforce

The CCC estimates 8,000 to 75,000 existing jobs may not continue in current form.

Bounds transition-pay exposure.

A Net Zero workforce (2023)

BEIS and Department for Education, 2021

Green Jobs Taskforce report

The Green Jobs Taskforce emphasised skills plans and worker engagement in transition.

Supports targeting pay protection with retraining.

Green Jobs Taskforce report (2021)

Sources

Other Green policies

PolicyLens estimates are illustrative and not official costings.