PolicyLens

Reform UK - Tax

Expand transferable marriage allowance

Allow one spouse to transfer 25% of their personal allowance to the other spouse.

Last updated: May 2026.

Read the policy-specific methodology note

Allowance design

Reform's Contract proposed a UK 25% transferable marriage allowance, meaning no tax on the first GBP 25,000 of income for either spouse when finances allow.

  • Current transferable allowance is much smaller.
  • One-earner couples gain most.
  • Second-earner incentives may weaken.

Core trade-offs

Eligible couples gain a tax cut, especially one-earner households. The cost falls on the Exchequer and the policy does little for single adults or couples already using both allowances.

  • One-earner couples gain directly.
  • Single people receive no benefit.
  • Second-earner work incentives may fall.

Illustrative fiscal impact

+GBP 8.0bn to +GBP 35.0bn. Central estimate: +GBP 18.0bn.

  • Positive numbers mean public-finance pressure; negative numbers mean Exchequer savings.
  • 25% transfer is the main scale marker.
  • Gross costs and receipt offsets are separated in methodology.
  • Behaviour and pass-through widen the range.
  • This is not an official costing.

Economic impact by 2027-28

  • Jobs: Can weaken second-earner incentives, especially for lower-earning spouses.
  • Wages: Raises net income for eligible couples; no wage-floor effect.
  • Prices: If borrowing-funded, adds modest demand pressure rather than supply.
  • GDP / productivity: Likely neutral or negative if it reduces second-earner labour supply.

Assessment

This is a family-tax preference, not a growth policy. It helps some one-earner couples, but excludes singles and many dual-earner households. The likely GDP effect is weak and could be negative if second earners reduce hours. The fiscal cost is very uncertain without a full household model.

Confidence: Low. The broad allowance percentage is stated, but eligibility, interaction with personal-allowance tapering and devolved tax effects are unclear.

Main risks

  • Second-earner effect: Transferability can reduce incentives for lower-earning partners to work more hours.
  • Distributional skew: Benefits go to eligible couples, not single adults or many poorer non-taxpayers.
  • Fiscal drag loss: Raising effective allowances reverses future fiscal-drag receipts.

Safeguards

  • Publish household distributional analysis.
  • Protect second-earner work incentives.
  • Phase only after identified funding.

Academic evidence

Kleven, Kreiner and Saez, Econometrica, 2009

Income taxation of couples

Couple taxation affects primary and secondary earners differently, especially when second-earner participation is elastic.

Relevant to transferable allowances and possible second-earner disincentives.

The Optimal Income Taxation of Couples (2009)

Mirrlees and review team, IFS and Oxford University Press, 2011

Tax design and broad bases

The review favours simple tax structures and warns against reliefs that narrow the tax base.

Supports scepticism about expanding targeted household allowances.

Tax by Design: The Mirrlees Review (2011)

UK government evidence

HM Revenue and Customs, 2026

Illustrative tax changes

HMRC ready-reckoners show large revenue effects from income-tax, NI, VAT, fuel-duty and corporation-tax changes.

Primary fiscal scale anchor.

Direct effects of illustrative tax changes (2026)

Reform UK, 2024

Reform tax detail

The Contract specifies thresholds, duties and business-tax proposals while claiming annual cost and saving totals.

Defines broad current tax pledges.

Our Contract with You (2024)

Sources

Other Reform UK policies

PolicyLens estimates are illustrative and not official costings.