Reform UK - Wealth tax
Raise inheritance-tax threshold to GBP 2m
Abolish inheritance tax below GBP 2m and charge 20% above that level.
Last updated: May 2026.
Estate baseline
Reform's 2024 Contract proposed abolishing inheritance tax below GBP 2m and charging 20% above it. Current IHT raises several billion pounds a year and applies to a minority of estates.
- Most estates already pay no IHT.
- The threshold rise is very large.
- The rate above GBP 2m is halved.
Core trade-offs
Affected estates and heirs gain substantially, especially wealthier households. The Exchequer loses revenue and wealth concentration rises unless offset elsewhere.
- Heirs to larger estates gain directly.
- Treasury loses progressive tax receipts.
- Avoidance incentives may fall but remain material.
Illustrative fiscal impact
+GBP 3.0bn to +GBP 9.0bn. Central estimate: +GBP 5.5bn.
- Positive numbers mean public-finance pressure; negative numbers mean Exchequer savings.
- GBP 2m threshold is the main scale marker.
- Gross costs and receipt offsets are separated in methodology.
- Behaviour and pass-through widen the range.
- This is not an official costing.
Economic impact by 2027-28
- Jobs: No direct job effect; family-business cases are narrower than the full tax cut.
- Wages: No wage gain; benefits accrue through inheritances and wealth transfers.
- Prices: Could support asset demand, especially housing and private businesses.
- GDP / productivity: Likely small or negative if wealth tax revenue is replaced by broader taxes.
Assessment
This is a large cut to one of the more progressive parts of the tax system. It may reduce some avoidance and family-business liquidity problems, but the main gains go to relatively wealthy estates. The output effect is unlikely to be strongly positive, while the revenue loss is real and recurring.
Confidence: Medium-low. Receipts are known, but threshold and rate changes alter estate planning, gifting and asset behaviour.
Main risks
- Progressivity loss: Benefits concentrate among estates large enough to pay inheritance tax.
- Revenue replacement: Lost receipts must be replaced by borrowing, spending cuts or less progressive taxes.
- Asset effects: Lower taxation of inheritances may increase wealth concentration and asset demand.
Safeguards
- Publish estate-value distribution before legislating.
- Target business-liquidity issues directly.
- Retain anti-avoidance and trust rules.
Academic evidence
Piketty and Saez, Econometrica, 2013
Optimal inheritance taxation
Inheritance-tax design depends on bequest behaviour, wealth concentration and society’s redistribution preferences.
Frames the policy as a distributional choice, not just a family-tax cut.
Saez, Slemrod and Giertz, Journal of Economic Literature, 2012
Taxable income responses
Tax responses can include avoidance and timing rather than large real activity effects.
Relevant to behavioural uncertainty in inheritance-tax revenue losses.
UK government evidence
HM Revenue and Customs, 2026
Illustrative tax changes
HMRC ready-reckoners show large revenue effects from income-tax, NI, VAT, fuel-duty and corporation-tax changes.
Primary fiscal scale anchor.
Reform UK, 2024
Reform tax detail
The Contract specifies thresholds, duties and business-tax proposals while claiming annual cost and saving totals.
Defines broad current tax pledges.
Sources
- PolicyLens illustrative scenario methodology: Raise inheritance-tax threshold to GBP 2m Internal - PolicyLens, 2026
- The Elasticity of Taxable Income Academic article - Saez, Slemrod and Giertz, Journal of Economic Literature, 2012
- Direct effects of illustrative tax changes Official tax data - HM Revenue and Customs, 2026
- Our Contract with You Party policy document - Reform UK, 2024
- A Theory of Optimal Inheritance Taxation Academic article - Piketty and Saez, Econometrica, 2013
- Our Policies Party policy source - Reform UK, 2026
Other Reform UK policies
PolicyLens estimates are illustrative and not official costings.