Methodology note
Expand transferable marriage allowance: calculation note
Assumptions behind the Expand transferable marriage allowance scenario. Implementation detail is incomplete, so uncertainty is explicit.
View main policy page: Expand transferable marriage allowance
Central fiscal result
+GBP 18.0bn - Net fiscal impact in 2027-28
Low case: +GBP 8.0bn. High case: +GBP 35.0bn. Positive numbers are fiscal costs or borrowing pressure. Negative numbers are Exchequer savings or receipts.
Scenario and baseline
- A 25% transferable marriage allowance is introduced.
- Central case uses UK-wide eligibility for married couples.
- No automatic benefit offset is assumed.
- Eligibility for higher-rate taxpayers is unclear.
Affected population
- Affected units are married couples and civil partners.
- One-earner couples receive the largest cash gain.
- Singles and many dual-earner couples gain nothing.
- Second earners face changed incentives.
Gross impact
- Current maximum transfer is GBP 1,260.
- Reform wording implies a much larger transfer.
- Central cost uses GBP 18bn before wider offsets.
- Low and high cases reflect eligibility uncertainty.
Fiscal build-up, central case
- Income-tax receipts lost: +GBP 18.0bn
- Labour-supply reduction: +GBP 1.0bn
- Benefit and tax-credit offsets: -GBP 1.5bn
- Administration: +GBP 0.5bn
Central net impact: +GBP 18.0bn in 2027-28.
Behaviour and pass-through
- Low case assumes restricted eligibility and lower take-up.
- Central case assumes broad take-up among eligible couples.
- High case assumes higher-rate eligibility and weaker second-earner supply.
- No growth dividend is counted.
Phasing
- 2026-27: +GBP 2.0bn. Preparation or partial implementation.
- 2027-28: +GBP 18.0bn. Main scenario year.
- 2028-29: +GBP 19.0bn. Behaviour and pass-through develop.
- 2029-30: +GBP 20.0bn. Steady-state uncertainty persists.
Main source groups
- S1: Reform Contract defines the 25% transferable allowance.
- S2: Commons Library gives current marriage allowance and thresholds.
- S3: HMRC ready-reckoners anchor allowance-cost scale.
- S4: Mirrlees Review supports individual-taxation caution.
- S5: IFS notes the pledge lacks full government-style costing.
- S6: Couple-taxation studies inform secondary-earner and targeting risks.