PolicyLens

Conservative - Regulation

Scrap mandatory ESG reporting

Remove selected climate, sustainability and diversity reporting requirements for companies and financial firms.

Last updated: May 2026.

Read the policy-specific methodology note

Reporting baseline

The pledge covers mandatory ESG and diversity reporting, but does not specify which company-law, FCA or sustainability-disclosure rules are removed. Direct fiscal effects are small.

  • Companies save reporting costs.
  • Investors lose some standardised information.
  • Public fiscal effects are limited.

Core trade-offs

Firms gain lower compliance burdens. Investors, lenders and consumers may receive less comparable information about climate, governance and workforce risks, possibly raising capital-market information costs.

  • Reporting firms gain lower admin costs.
  • Investors lose comparable disclosures.
  • Fiscal impact is near zero.

Fiscal impact by 2028-29

-GBP 0.1bn to +GBP 0.5bn. Central estimate: GBP 0.0bn.

  • Positive numbers mean net fiscal cost; negative numbers mean Exchequer savings.
  • Direct public fiscal effect is small.
  • Private compliance savings are not Exchequer savings.
  • Rule coverage is unspecified.
  • This is not an official costing.

Economic impact by 2028-29

  • Jobs: Compliance jobs may fall; little aggregate employment effect.
  • Wages: No broad wage effect expected.
  • Prices: Small cost savings unlikely to change consumer prices materially.
  • GDP / productivity: Mixed: lower admin burden but worse information for capital allocation.

Assessment

This is mainly a regulatory-burden and information-quality trade-off, not a fiscal policy. The economic case depends on whether reporting requirements are genuinely duplicative or useful to investors and lenders.

Confidence: Medium-low. Reporting baselines are visible; firm compliance costs and information benefits are not fully measured.

Main risks

  • Information loss: Investors may lose comparable data on climate and governance risks.
  • International mismatch: UK firms may still report for EU, US or investor requirements.
  • Overclaiming savings: Private compliance savings are not public fiscal savings.

Safeguards

  • List every reporting rule removed.
  • Keep material risk disclosure for investors.
  • Avoid duplication rather than remove useful data.

Academic evidence

Dechezlepretre and Sato, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2017

Regulation and competitiveness

Environmental regulation can impose costs but competitiveness effects are often smaller than claimed.

Relevant to deregulation claims around net zero and ESG.

The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Competitiveness (2017)

Goulder and Parry, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2008

Environmental policy design

Instrument choice matters: taxes, permits and standards differ in efficiency and distributional effects.

Relevant to carbon pricing, CBAM and ZEV mandate choices.

Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy (2008)

UK government evidence

Office for Budget Responsibility, 2026

OBR fiscal forecast

The OBR forecast sets the macro, borrowing and receipts baseline used for broad fiscal context.

Prevents treating tax cuts or spending changes as self-financing.

Economic and fiscal outlook: March 2026 (2026)

Sources

Other Conservative policies

PolicyLens estimates are illustrative and should not be treated as official costings.