PolicyLens

Methodology note

Scrap mandatory ESG reporting: calculation note

Scenario assumptions behind the Scrap mandatory ESG reporting estimate. The figures are illustrative and exclude unrelated Conservative pledges.

View main policy page: Scrap mandatory ESG reporting

Central fiscal result

£0.0bn - Net fiscal impact in 2028-29

Low case: -£0.1bn. High case: +£0.5bn. Positive numbers are fiscal costs or borrowing pressure. Negative numbers are Exchequer savings or receipts.

Scenario and baseline

  • Model repeal of selected mandatory ESG and diversity reporting by 2028-29.
  • Central fiscal effect is zero.
  • Baseline includes climate-related disclosures and FCA SDR rules.
  • Private compliance savings are not Exchequer savings.

Affected population

  • Affected population is in-scope companies and financial firms.
  • Direct gains are lower reporting and assurance costs.
  • Indirect exposure includes investors, lenders and consumers.
  • International reporting obligations may remain.

Gross impact

  • Central public fiscal effect: £0.0bn.
  • Regulator savings and transition costs broadly offset.
  • Private compliance savings are not included in fiscal estimate.
  • High case assumes lost information raises public-risk costs.

Fiscal build-up, central case

  • Regulator administration savings: -£0.1bn
  • Transition and guidance costs: +£0.1bn
  • Tax receipt effects: £0.0bn
  • Public-risk information costs: £0.0bn

Central net impact: £0.0bn in 2028-29.

Behaviour and pass-through

  • Low case assumes duplication is removed efficiently.
  • Central case assumes small public savings and small costs.
  • High case assumes information loss raises later regulatory and risk costs.
  • Many firms still report to investors or overseas regulators.
  • Consumer price effects are likely minimal.

Phasing

  • 2026-27: £0.0bn. Preparation or partial implementation.
  • 2027-28: £0.0bn. Main ramp-up year.
  • 2028-29: £0.0bn. Target-year central estimate.
  • 2029-30: £0.0bn. Continuation at steady-state assumptions.

Main source groups

  • Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, "Climate-related financial disclosures for companies and LLPs" (2022): Mandatory climate-related disclosures apply to certain large companies and LLPs for years from April 2022; defines the reporting baseline.
  • Financial Conduct Authority, "Sustainability Disclosure Requirements regime" (2026): FCA SDR rules target anti-greenwashing, product labels and sustainability-related disclosures; relevant to financial-services reporting changes.
  • Office for Budget Responsibility, "Economic and fiscal outlook: March 2026" (2026): The OBR forecast sets the macro, borrowing and receipts baseline used for broad fiscal context; prevents treating tax cuts or spending changes as self-financing.
  • Dechezlepretre and Sato, "The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Competitiveness" (Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2017): Environmental regulation can impose costs but competitiveness effects are often smaller than claimed; relevant to deregulation claims around net zero and ESG.
  • Goulder and Parry, "Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy" (Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2008): Instrument choice matters: taxes, permits and standards differ in efficiency and distributional effects; relevant to carbon pricing, CBAM and ZEV mandate choices.
  • Conservative Party, "Our Plan for Britain" (2026): Used to define the pledge wording, policy scope and implementation scenario being modelled.