Methodology note
Scrap mandatory ESG reporting: calculation note
Scenario assumptions behind the Scrap mandatory ESG reporting estimate. The figures are illustrative and exclude unrelated Conservative pledges.
Central fiscal result
£0.0bn - Net fiscal impact in 2028-29
Low case: -£0.1bn. High case: +£0.5bn. Positive numbers are fiscal costs or borrowing pressure. Negative numbers are Exchequer savings or receipts.
Scenario and baseline
- Model repeal of selected mandatory ESG and diversity reporting by 2028-29.
- Central fiscal effect is zero.
- Baseline includes climate-related disclosures and FCA SDR rules.
- Private compliance savings are not Exchequer savings.
Affected population
- Affected population is in-scope companies and financial firms.
- Direct gains are lower reporting and assurance costs.
- Indirect exposure includes investors, lenders and consumers.
- International reporting obligations may remain.
Gross impact
- Central public fiscal effect: £0.0bn.
- Regulator savings and transition costs broadly offset.
- Private compliance savings are not included in fiscal estimate.
- High case assumes lost information raises public-risk costs.
Fiscal build-up, central case
- Regulator administration savings: -£0.1bn
- Transition and guidance costs: +£0.1bn
- Tax receipt effects: £0.0bn
- Public-risk information costs: £0.0bn
Central net impact: £0.0bn in 2028-29.
Behaviour and pass-through
- Low case assumes duplication is removed efficiently.
- Central case assumes small public savings and small costs.
- High case assumes information loss raises later regulatory and risk costs.
- Many firms still report to investors or overseas regulators.
- Consumer price effects are likely minimal.
Phasing
- 2026-27: £0.0bn. Preparation or partial implementation.
- 2027-28: £0.0bn. Main ramp-up year.
- 2028-29: £0.0bn. Target-year central estimate.
- 2029-30: £0.0bn. Continuation at steady-state assumptions.
Main source groups
- Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, "Climate-related financial disclosures for companies and LLPs" (2022): Mandatory climate-related disclosures apply to certain large companies and LLPs for years from April 2022; defines the reporting baseline.
- Financial Conduct Authority, "Sustainability Disclosure Requirements regime" (2026): FCA SDR rules target anti-greenwashing, product labels and sustainability-related disclosures; relevant to financial-services reporting changes.
- Office for Budget Responsibility, "Economic and fiscal outlook: March 2026" (2026): The OBR forecast sets the macro, borrowing and receipts baseline used for broad fiscal context; prevents treating tax cuts or spending changes as self-financing.
- Dechezlepretre and Sato, "The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Competitiveness" (Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2017): Environmental regulation can impose costs but competitiveness effects are often smaller than claimed; relevant to deregulation claims around net zero and ESG.
- Goulder and Parry, "Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy" (Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2008): Instrument choice matters: taxes, permits and standards differ in efficiency and distributional effects; relevant to carbon pricing, CBAM and ZEV mandate choices.
- Conservative Party, "Our Plan for Britain" (2026): Used to define the pledge wording, policy scope and implementation scenario being modelled.