PolicyLens

Green - Climate tax

Introduce GBP 120 carbon tax

Levy a broad carbon tax starting at GBP 120 per tonne and rising over time.

Last updated: May 2026.

Read the policy-specific methodology note

Policy baseline

The Green manifesto proposes a high carbon tax. Analysts question whether such a large revenue claim is compatible with falling emissions.

  • Targets fossil energy and embodied emissions.
  • Consumer compensation is unspecified.
  • Revenue falls if emissions fall.

Core trade-offs

The direct beneficiaries are climate mitigation and public revenue. The costs fall mainly on energy users, high-carbon firms and households. The main economic question is prices rise sharply without compensation.

  • Climate mitigation and public revenue gain most directly.
  • Costs fall mainly on energy users, high-carbon firms and households.
  • Key risk: prices rise sharply without compensation.

Fiscal impact by 2028-29

-GBP 90.0bn to -GBP 10.0bn. Central estimate: -GBP 40.0bn.

  • Positive numbers mean net fiscal cost; negative numbers mean Exchequer savings.
  • Main channel is the scored tax, spending or delivery change.
  • Offsets depend on tax receipts, behaviour and pass-through.
  • Range reflects uncertain implementation and economic response.
  • This is not an official costing.

Economic impact by 2028-29

  • Jobs: High-carbon sectors face job risk; low-carbon sectors gain if revenues are recycled well.
  • Wages: Real incomes fall without compensation; green-sector wages may rise.
  • Prices: Energy, transport and goods prices rise unless revenue is recycled.
  • GDP / productivity: Likely negative short-run output effect; long-run welfare gains depend on emissions reduction.

Assessment

This is a real trade-off, not a free gain. Climate mitigation and public revenue benefit, while energy users, high-carbon firms and households bear most costs. Overall output depends on behaviour, capacity and pass-through.

Confidence: Medium-low. Higher on the policy target and fiscal channel; lower on behaviour, pass-through and economy-wide effects.

Main risks

  • Regressive prices: Energy and transport costs hit poorer households unless compensated.
  • Carbon leakage: Emissions and production can shift abroad without border measures.
  • Revenue erosion: A successful carbon tax shrinks its own tax base over time.

Safeguards

  • Recycle revenue to households transparently.
  • Use border measures for leakage risk.
  • Publish distributional impacts before launch.

Academic evidence

Andersson, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2019

Carbon tax evidence

Sweden’s carbon tax reduced emissions while maintaining economic growth, but institutional context mattered.

Supports carbon-pricing benefits with design caveats.

Carbon Taxes and CO2 Emissions (2019)

UK government evidence

Green Party of England and Wales, 2024

Green manifesto

The manifesto defines the tax, spending, climate, housing and public-service proposals modelled here.

Used to define the scenario, not as an official costing.

Manifesto for a Fairer, Greener Country (2024)

HMRC, 2025

HMRC ready reckoners

HMRC publishes direct-effect tax-change estimates but warns large reforms are not simple linear scalings.

Anchors tax-yield scale and supports wider uncertainty ranges.

Direct effects of illustrative tax changes (2025)

Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2024

IFS Green reaction

IFS judged Green tax and spending plans very large and difficult to deliver at claimed yields.

Supports sceptical revenue and behavioural assumptions.

Green Party manifesto: a reaction (2024)

Climate Change Committee, 2025

Carbon Budget advice

CCC advice shows decarbonisation needs stronger policy but also careful handling of distributional costs.

Useful context for carbon-price design and household compensation.

The Seventh Carbon Budget (2025)

Sources

Other Green policies

PolicyLens estimates are illustrative and should not be treated as official costings.