Conservative - Energy tax
Abolish carbon taxes and CBAM
Remove selected carbon-pricing measures, including the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism where applicable.
Last updated: May 2026.
Policy baseline
The pledge refers to carbon taxes and CBAM, but does not define the full list. The central case removes a substantial share of carbon-pricing receipts while leaving some legacy levies intact.
- Receipts depend on which instruments are repealed.
- Energy-intensive firms gain directly.
- Emissions and future abatement costs rise.
Core trade-offs
Firms and consumers facing carbon costs may gain lower prices. The Exchequer loses receipts and emissions incentives weaken, increasing the likelihood of higher future abatement costs or missed targets.
- Energy-intensive users gain cost relief.
- Treasury loses environmental receipts.
- Climate targets become harder to meet.
Fiscal impact by 2028-29
+GBP 1.5bn to +GBP 6.0bn. Central estimate: +GBP 3.0bn.
- Positive numbers mean net fiscal cost; negative numbers mean Exchequer savings.
- Main cost is lost carbon-pricing receipts.
- Lower business costs may recover small receipts.
- Instrument list is not specified.
- This is not an official costing.
Economic impact by 2028-29
- Jobs: Some exposed firms benefit; clean-sector jobs and investment face pressure.
- Wages: Limited broad wage effect; sectoral gains and losses differ.
- Prices: Some energy and industrial prices may fall if cost reductions pass through.
- GDP / productivity: Near-term relief possible; long-run productivity negative if clean innovation falls.
Assessment
Carbon-pricing repeal may lower some business costs, but it removes a revenue source and weakens incentives to reduce emissions. Without an alternative abatement plan, future fiscal and regulatory costs likely rise.
Confidence: Low. Revenue baselines exist, but the policy does not define which carbon instruments are abolished.
Main risks
- Target failure: Removing carbon prices makes emissions targets harder to meet without heavier regulation.
- Investment loss: Clean-energy and industrial-decarbonisation investment may fall.
- Border risk: Repealing CBAM while others use border measures can disadvantage UK exporters or importers.
Safeguards
- List every tax and levy repealed.
- Publish replacement emissions pathway.
- Separate household relief from industrial relief.
Academic evidence
Andersson, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2019
Carbon tax evidence
Sweden's carbon tax reduced emissions while measured GDP effects were limited in that setting.
Relevant to scrapping carbon taxes and fuel duties.
Carbon Taxes and CO2 Emissions: Sweden as a Case Study (2019)
Goulder and Parry, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2008
Environmental policy design
Instrument choice matters: taxes, permits and standards differ in efficiency and distributional effects.
Relevant to carbon pricing, CBAM and ZEV mandate choices.
Dechezlepretre and Sato, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2017
Regulation and competitiveness
Environmental regulation can impose costs but competitiveness effects are often smaller than claimed.
Relevant to deregulation claims around net zero and ESG.
The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Competitiveness (2017)
UK government evidence
Office for Budget Responsibility, 2024
OBR October 2024 forecast
The OBR scores fuel-duty, EPL and environmental-receipts measures and discusses oil-and-gas uncertainty.
Anchors energy and motoring estimates.
HM Revenue and Customs, 2025
HMRC tax ready reckoner
HMRC provides direct-effect estimates for illustrative changes to SDLT, VAT, fuel duties and other taxes.
Anchors tax costs before behavioural and macro adjustments.
Office for Budget Responsibility, 2026
OBR fiscal forecast
The OBR forecast sets the macro, borrowing and receipts baseline used for broad fiscal context.
Prevents treating tax cuts or spending changes as self-financing.
Sources
- PolicyLens methodology: Abolish carbon taxes and CBAM Internal - PolicyLens, 2026
- Economic and fiscal outlook: October 2024 Fiscal forecast - Office for Budget Responsibility, 2024
- Direct effects of illustrative tax changes bulletin UK government statistics - HM Revenue and Customs, 2025
- Economic and fiscal outlook: March 2026 Fiscal forecast - Office for Budget Responsibility, 2026
- Carbon Taxes and CO2 Emissions: Sweden as a Case Study Academic article - Andersson, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2019
- Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy Academic article - Goulder and Parry, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2008
- The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Competitiveness Academic review - Dechezlepretre and Sato, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2017
- Our Plan for Britain Party policy source - Conservative Party, 2026
Other Conservative policies
PolicyLens estimates are illustrative and should not be treated as official costings.