Methodology note
Raise defence spending to 3% of GDP: calculation note
Assumptions behind the Raise defence spending to 3% of GDP scenario. Implementation detail is incomplete, so uncertainty is explicit.
Central fiscal result
+GBP 10.0bn - Net fiscal impact in 2029-30
Low case: +GBP 4.0bn. High case: +GBP 18.0bn. Positive numbers are fiscal costs or borrowing pressure. Negative numbers are Exchequer savings or receipts.
Scenario and baseline
- Defence reaches 3% of GDP within six years.
- Baseline includes current 2.5% by 2027 commitment.
- Costs use broad NATO-style defence spending terms.
- No offsetting aid cut is included here.
Affected population
- Affected units are MoD budgets, personnel and defence suppliers.
- UK taxpayers fund the increase.
- Industrial regions with defence supply chains gain demand.
- Other departments face possible crowding-out.
Gross impact
- A 0.5 percentage-point GDP uplift is a large commitment.
- Central extra cost is GBP 10bn by 2029-30.
- Low case assumes baseline already moves near 3%.
- High case assumes higher GDP and broader definitions.
Fiscal build-up, central case
- Extra personnel and equipment spending: +GBP 10.5bn
- Tax receipts from defence wages: -GBP 0.8bn
- Procurement inflation and transition: +GBP 0.3bn
- Administration and uncertainty: +GBP 0.0bn
Central net impact: +GBP 10.0bn in 2029-30.
Behaviour and pass-through
- Low case assumes current policy funds much of the increase.
- Central case assumes a clear 0.5% GDP gap remains.
- High case assumes procurement inflation and broader spending.
- Domestic multipliers are not scored as self-financing.
Phasing
- 2026-27: +GBP 2.0bn. Preparation or partial implementation.
- 2027-28: +GBP 4.0bn. Main scenario year.
- 2028-29: +GBP 7.0bn. Behaviour and pass-through develop.
- 2029-30: +GBP 10.0bn. Steady-state uncertainty persists.
Main source groups
- S1: Reform Contract states 2.5% then 3% within six years.
- S2: Commons Library describes current 2.5% and higher commitments.
- S3: Strategic Defence Review shows planned 2.5% framework.
- S4: Fiscal-multiplier studies inform output-risk from higher defence spending.
- S5: Exact NATO definition and baseline remain uncertain.