PolicyLens

Liberal Democrats - Higher education

Reinstate maintenance grants

Restore maintenance grants and create Lifelong Skills Grants.

Last updated: May 2026.

Read the policy-specific methodology note

Policy baseline

The costings allocate GBP 1.5bn to higher education and lifelong learning by 2028-29.

  • Targets students and adult learners.
  • Loan-book effects are excluded from headline.
  • Participation response changes long-run cost.

Core trade-offs

The direct beneficiaries are students and adult learners. The costs fall mainly on taxpayers and future student-loan balances. The main economic question is access gains depend on course quality.

  • Students and adult learners gain most directly.
  • Costs fall mainly on taxpayers and future student-loan balances.
  • Key risk: access gains depend on course quality.

Fiscal impact by 2028-29

+GBP 1.0bn to +GBP 3.5bn. Central estimate: +GBP 1.5bn.

  • Positive numbers mean net fiscal cost; negative numbers mean Exchequer savings.
  • Main channel is the scored tax, spending or delivery change.
  • Offsets depend on tax receipts, behaviour and pass-through.
  • Range reflects uncertain implementation and economic response.
  • This is not an official costing.

Economic impact by 2028-29

  • Jobs: Education hiring rises; shortages and retention problems may cap delivery.
  • Wages: Teachers, childcare staff or students gain; taxpayers fund the cost.
  • Prices: Childcare prices may fall if supply expands; wage pressure can offset subsidies.
  • GDP / productivity: Long-run gains possible; short-run GDP effects depend on staffing and quality.

Assessment

This is a real trade-off, not a free gain. Students and adult learners benefit, while taxpayers and future student-loan balances bear most costs. Overall output depends on behaviour, capacity and pass-through.

Confidence: Medium-low. Higher on the policy target and fiscal channel; lower on behaviour, pass-through and economy-wide effects.

Main risks

  • Staffing shortage: Recruitment and retention can limit delivery.
  • Quality variation: Extra places or grants do not guarantee high-quality provision.
  • Long payback: Economic returns take years and are hard to score fiscally.

Safeguards

  • Target shortages and disadvantaged pupils.
  • Audit quality and staff retention.
  • Evaluate outcomes before expansion.

Academic evidence

Murphy, Scott-Clayton and Wyness, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2019

English higher education finance

England’s loan system expanded access but shifted costs and risks across students and taxpayers.

Relevant to student finance reforms.

The End of Free College in England (2019)

UK government evidence

Sources

Other Liberal Democrats policies

PolicyLens estimates are illustrative and should not be treated as official costings.