PolicyLens

Liberal Democrats - Tax

Raise digital services tax

Increase the Digital Services Tax from 2 percent to 6 percent.

Last updated: May 2026.

Read the policy-specific methodology note

Policy baseline

Party costings claim GBP 2.09bn from raising the DST to 6 percent. International response and platform pass-through are key uncertainties.

  • Targets large digital platforms.
  • Users and advertisers may bear costs.
  • International tax rules may change.

Core trade-offs

The direct beneficiaries are the exchequer and domestic competitors. The costs fall mainly on large platforms, advertisers and users. The main economic question is pass-through can raise online advertising costs.

  • The exchequer and domestic competitors gain most directly.
  • Costs fall mainly on large platforms, advertisers and users.
  • Key risk: pass-through can raise online advertising costs.

Fiscal impact by 2028-29

-GBP 3.0bn to -GBP 0.4bn. Central estimate: -GBP 1.6bn.

  • Positive numbers mean net fiscal cost; negative numbers mean Exchequer savings.
  • Main channel is the scored tax, spending or delivery change.
  • Offsets depend on tax receipts, behaviour and pass-through.
  • Range reflects uncertain implementation and economic response.
  • This is not an official costing.

Economic impact by 2028-29

  • Jobs: Little direct job effect; sector-specific taxes can reduce hiring in affected industries.
  • Wages: Legal taxpayers may shift costs to workers, owners or consumers over time.
  • Prices: Some pass-through likely where market power or fixed demand exists.
  • GDP / productivity: Usually mildly negative before spending use; stronger if investment or mobility responses rise.

Assessment

This is a real trade-off, not a free gain. The exchequer and domestic competitors benefit, while large platforms, advertisers and users bear most costs. Overall output depends on behaviour, capacity and pass-through.

Confidence: Medium-low. Higher on the policy target and fiscal channel; lower on behaviour, pass-through and economy-wide effects.

Main risks

  • Behavioural response: Avoidance, timing and relocation can reduce receipts.
  • Incidence uncertainty: Legal taxpayers may shift costs to workers, consumers or investors.
  • Investment risk: Higher taxes can reduce investment where returns are mobile.

Safeguards

  • Use HMRC microsimulation before legislating.
  • Close avoidance routes before rate rises.
  • Review receipts and investment annually.

Academic evidence

Kotlikoff and Summers, Handbook of Public Economics, 1987

Tax incidence

The legal payer of a tax is not necessarily the person bearing its economic burden.

Supports incidence discussion across taxes.

Tax Incidence (1987)

UK government evidence

Sources

Other Liberal Democrats policies

PolicyLens estimates are illustrative and should not be treated as official costings.