Labour - Tax
Raise employer National Insurance
Increase employer NICs to 15 percent and lower the secondary threshold from April 2025.
Last updated: May 2026.
Policy baseline
The implemented Budget measure raises the employer NIC rate and lowers the threshold. Official costings score around GBP 24.2bn receipts in 2027-28.
- Rate rises from 13.8 percent to 15 percent.
- Secondary threshold falls from GBP 9,100 to GBP 5,000.
- OBR expects labour-supply and wage effects.
Core trade-offs
The direct beneficiaries are public services and fiscal headroom. The costs fall mainly on employers, workers and consumers. The main economic question is higher labour costs reduce jobs, wages or margins.
- Public services and fiscal headroom gain most directly.
- Costs fall mainly on employers, workers and consumers.
- Key risk: higher labour costs reduce jobs, wages or margins.
Fiscal impact by 2027-28
-GBP 27.0bn to -GBP 18.0bn. Central estimate: -GBP 24.2bn.
- Positive numbers mean net fiscal cost; negative numbers mean Exchequer savings.
- Main effect is higher employer payroll-tax receipts.
- Lower wages, profits and labour supply reduce part of the yield.
- Incidence is likely shared across workers, firms and consumers.
- This is not an official costing.
Economic impact by 2027-28
- Jobs: Little direct job effect; sector-specific taxes can reduce hiring in affected industries.
- Wages: Legal taxpayers may shift costs to workers, owners or consumers over time.
- Prices: Some pass-through likely where market power or fixed demand exists.
- GDP / productivity: Usually mildly negative before spending use; stronger if investment or mobility responses rise.
Assessment
This is a real trade-off, not a free gain. Public services and fiscal headroom benefit, while employers, workers and consumers bear most costs. Overall output depends on behaviour, capacity and pass-through.
Confidence: Medium-low. Higher on the policy target and fiscal channel; lower on behaviour, pass-through and economy-wide effects.
Main risks
- Behavioural response: Avoidance, timing and relocation can reduce receipts.
- Incidence uncertainty: Legal taxpayers may shift costs to workers, consumers or investors.
- Investment risk: Higher taxes can reduce investment where returns are mobile.
Safeguards
- Use HMRC microsimulation before legislating.
- Close avoidance routes before rate rises.
- Review receipts and investment annually.
Academic evidence
Gruber, Journal of Public Economics, 1997
Payroll tax incidence
Employer payroll taxes are often shifted partly to workers through wages, but incidence depends on institutions and time.
Important for employer NIC and labour-cost policies.
Kotlikoff and Summers, Handbook of Public Economics, 1987
Tax incidence
The legal payer of a tax is not necessarily the person bearing its economic burden.
Supports incidence discussion across taxes.
UK government evidence
HM Treasury, 2024
Autumn Budget costings
Official policy costings show tax and spending impacts, including behavioural assumptions where published.
Used for implemented Labour tax measures.
Office for Budget Responsibility, 2024
OBR Budget assessment
The OBR assessed employer NICs, public investment and Budget-wide output and inflation effects.
Supports economic-impact and tax-incidence assumptions.
Sources
- PolicyLens illustrative scenario methodology for raise employer national insurance Internal - PolicyLens, 2026
- Autumn Budget 2024 policy costings UK government costing - HM Treasury, 2024
- The Incidence of Payroll Taxation Academic article - Gruber, Journal of Public Economics, 1997
- Tax Incidence Academic chapter - Kotlikoff and Summers, Handbook of Public Economics, 1987
- Economic and fiscal outlook October 2024 UK fiscal forecast - Office for Budget Responsibility, 2024
- Change: Labour Party Manifesto 2024 Party policy source - Labour Party, 2024
Other Labour policies
PolicyLens estimates are illustrative and should not be treated as official costings.