PolicyLens

Labour - Tax

Raise employer National Insurance

Increase employer NICs to 15 percent and lower the secondary threshold from April 2025.

Last updated: May 2026.

Read the policy-specific methodology note

Policy baseline

The implemented Budget measure raises the employer NIC rate and lowers the threshold. Official costings score around GBP 24.2bn receipts in 2027-28.

  • Rate rises from 13.8 percent to 15 percent.
  • Secondary threshold falls from GBP 9,100 to GBP 5,000.
  • OBR expects labour-supply and wage effects.

Core trade-offs

The direct beneficiaries are public services and fiscal headroom. The costs fall mainly on employers, workers and consumers. The main economic question is higher labour costs reduce jobs, wages or margins.

  • Public services and fiscal headroom gain most directly.
  • Costs fall mainly on employers, workers and consumers.
  • Key risk: higher labour costs reduce jobs, wages or margins.

Fiscal impact by 2027-28

-GBP 27.0bn to -GBP 18.0bn. Central estimate: -GBP 24.2bn.

  • Positive numbers mean net fiscal cost; negative numbers mean Exchequer savings.
  • Main effect is higher employer payroll-tax receipts.
  • Lower wages, profits and labour supply reduce part of the yield.
  • Incidence is likely shared across workers, firms and consumers.
  • This is not an official costing.

Economic impact by 2027-28

  • Jobs: Little direct job effect; sector-specific taxes can reduce hiring in affected industries.
  • Wages: Legal taxpayers may shift costs to workers, owners or consumers over time.
  • Prices: Some pass-through likely where market power or fixed demand exists.
  • GDP / productivity: Usually mildly negative before spending use; stronger if investment or mobility responses rise.

Assessment

This is a real trade-off, not a free gain. Public services and fiscal headroom benefit, while employers, workers and consumers bear most costs. Overall output depends on behaviour, capacity and pass-through.

Confidence: Medium-low. Higher on the policy target and fiscal channel; lower on behaviour, pass-through and economy-wide effects.

Main risks

  • Behavioural response: Avoidance, timing and relocation can reduce receipts.
  • Incidence uncertainty: Legal taxpayers may shift costs to workers, consumers or investors.
  • Investment risk: Higher taxes can reduce investment where returns are mobile.

Safeguards

  • Use HMRC microsimulation before legislating.
  • Close avoidance routes before rate rises.
  • Review receipts and investment annually.

Academic evidence

Gruber, Journal of Public Economics, 1997

Payroll tax incidence

Employer payroll taxes are often shifted partly to workers through wages, but incidence depends on institutions and time.

Important for employer NIC and labour-cost policies.

The Incidence of Payroll Taxation (1997)

Kotlikoff and Summers, Handbook of Public Economics, 1987

Tax incidence

The legal payer of a tax is not necessarily the person bearing its economic burden.

Supports incidence discussion across taxes.

Tax Incidence (1987)

UK government evidence

HM Treasury, 2024

Autumn Budget costings

Official policy costings show tax and spending impacts, including behavioural assumptions where published.

Used for implemented Labour tax measures.

Autumn Budget 2024 policy costings (2024)

Office for Budget Responsibility, 2024

OBR Budget assessment

The OBR assessed employer NICs, public investment and Budget-wide output and inflation effects.

Supports economic-impact and tax-incidence assumptions.

Economic and fiscal outlook October 2024 (2024)

Sources

Other Labour policies

PolicyLens estimates are illustrative and should not be treated as official costings.