PolicyLens

Methodology note

Scrap net-zero subsidies: calculation note

Assumptions behind the Scrap net-zero subsidies scenario. Implementation detail is incomplete, so uncertainty is explicit.

View main policy page: Scrap net-zero subsidies

Central fiscal result

-£3.0bn - Net fiscal impact in 2027-28

Low case: -£12.0bn. High case: +£10.0bn. Positive numbers are fiscal costs or borrowing pressure. Negative numbers are Exchequer savings or receipts.

Scenario and baseline

  • Renewable subsidies and selected climate schemes are cancelled.
  • Domestic fossil-fuel licensing is expanded.
  • Existing contract compensation is included in the high case.
  • Climate-damage costs are outside the fiscal score.

Affected population

  • Affected units are households, energy firms, investors and supply chains.
  • Bill-payers may see levy cuts if pass-through occurs.
  • Renewables, retrofit and grid sectors face lower demand.
  • Fossil-fuel producers may gain licences.

Gross impact

  • Reform claimed £30bn annual saving.
  • Central fiscal saving is only £3bn after contract and levy caveats.
  • Low case saves £12bn if schemes are cancelled.
  • High case costs £10bn from compensation and instability.

Fiscal build-up, central case

  • Scheme and levy savings: -£8.0bn
  • Contract compensation and transition: +£3.0bn
  • Replacement energy-security spending: +£2.0bn
  • Lost tax and investment effects: +£0.0bn

Central net impact: -£3.0bn in 2027-28.

Behaviour and pass-through

  • Low case assumes schemes can be cancelled with limited compensation.
  • Central case assumes many costs sit on bills or contracts.
  • High case assumes compensation and financing costs exceed savings.
  • Short-run bill relief may increase energy demand.

Phasing

  • 2026-27: -£1.0bn. Preparation or partial implementation.
  • 2027-28: -£3.0bn. Main scenario year.
  • 2028-29: -£4.0bn. Behaviour and pass-through develop.
  • 2029-30: -£5.0bn. Steady-state uncertainty persists.

Main source groups

  • Metcalf and Stock, "The Macroeconomic Impact of Europe's Carbon Taxes" (American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2020): Observed European carbon taxes did not produce large negative macroeconomic effects; weakens the claim that climate policy is mainly an economy-wide drag.
  • Stern and review team, "The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review" (HM Treasury and Cambridge University Press, 2006): Unpriced climate damages create long-run economic costs that conventional budgets may miss; explains why fiscal savings can come with external-cost risks.
  • Ofgem, "Energy price cap explained" (2026): The April-June 2026 cap is £1,641 for a typical dual-fuel direct-debit household; scale check for energy-bill relief.
  • Reform UK, "Our Contract with You" (2024): Reform pledges cheaper energy by scrapping net-zero policies, levies and taxes; defines policy direction but not details.
  • Andersson, "Carbon Taxes and CO2 Emissions: Sweden as a Case Study" (American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2019): Sweden’s carbon tax reduced transport emissions relative to a synthetic-control comparison; relevant to emissions risk from weakening decarbonisation incentives.
  • Reform UK, "Our Policies" (2026): Reform pledges cheaper energy by scrapping net-zero policies, levies and taxes; defines policy direction but not details.