PolicyLens

Methodology note

Stop some reserve-interest payments: calculation note

Assumptions behind the Stop some reserve-interest payments scenario. Implementation detail is incomplete, so uncertainty is explicit.

View main policy page: Stop some reserve-interest payments

Central fiscal result

-£10.0bn - Net fiscal impact in 2027-28

Low case: -£25.0bn. High case: +£5.0bn. Positive numbers are fiscal costs or borrowing pressure. Negative numbers are Exchequer savings or receipts.

Scenario and baseline

  • Interest on some QE-created reserves is reduced or tiered.
  • The Bank Rate path is not changed mechanically.
  • Bank-tax receipt offsets are included.
  • A full unpaid-reserve regime is not central.

Affected population

  • Affected units are banks, depositors, borrowers and the Exchequer.
  • QE reserves are currently remunerated at Bank Rate.
  • Bank profits and lending rates may adjust.
  • Monetary-policy operations become more complex.

Gross impact

  • Reform claimed about £35bn annual saving.
  • Central case uses £15bn gross feasible saving.
  • Bank-tax and credit offsets reduce this to £10bn.
  • High case allows market costs to exceed savings.

Fiscal build-up, central case

  • Gross reserve-interest saving: -£15.0bn
  • Lower bank tax receipts: +£2.5bn
  • Higher financing and implementation risk: +£2.0bn
  • Administration and compensation: +£0.5bn

Central net impact: -£10.0bn in 2027-28.

Behaviour and pass-through

  • Low case assumes carefully designed tiering and limited market reaction.
  • Central case assumes partial pass-through and bank-tax offsets.
  • High case assumes credibility costs raise wider financing costs.
  • The saving varies strongly with Bank Rate.

Phasing

  • 2026-27: -£2.0bn. Preparation or partial implementation.
  • 2027-28: -£10.0bn. Main scenario year.
  • 2028-29: -£12.0bn. Behaviour and pass-through develop.
  • 2029-30: -£10.0bn. Steady-state uncertainty persists.

Main source groups

  • Office for Budget Responsibility, "A brief guide to the public finances" (2026): The OBR expects public receipts of about £1,235bn in 2025-26; scale check for large packages.
  • Reform UK, "Our Contract with You" (2024): The Contract claims large savings from departments, QE reserves, aid, welfare and net zero; defines scenarios but needs caution.
  • House of Commons Library, "Central bank reserves and government's debt interest" (2026): Used to size the affected population, baseline economic quantities and sectoral exposure.
  • Office for Budget Responsibility, "The fiscal impact of quantitative easing and quantitative tightening" (2023): Used for the macro-fiscal baseline, receipts and spending context, and relevant behavioural assumptions.
  • Hall and Reis, "Maintaining Central-Bank Financial Stability under New-Style Central Banking" (NBER Working Paper, 2015): Interest-paying reserves and central-bank assets create fiscal and solvency risks under new-style central banking; relevant to reserve-interest payments and Treasury indemnity risks.
  • Reis, "Funding Quantitative Easing to Target Inflation" (Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium, 2016): QE funding through central-bank liabilities matters for inflation control and balance-sheet transmission; warns against treating reserve-interest reform as a free fiscal saving.
  • Reform UK, "Our Policies" (2026): Used to define the pledge wording, policy scope and implementation scenario being modelled.