Methodology note
Stop some reserve-interest payments: calculation note
Assumptions behind the Stop some reserve-interest payments scenario. Implementation detail is incomplete, so uncertainty is explicit.
Central fiscal result
-£10.0bn - Net fiscal impact in 2027-28
Low case: -£25.0bn. High case: +£5.0bn. Positive numbers are fiscal costs or borrowing pressure. Negative numbers are Exchequer savings or receipts.
Scenario and baseline
- Interest on some QE-created reserves is reduced or tiered.
- The Bank Rate path is not changed mechanically.
- Bank-tax receipt offsets are included.
- A full unpaid-reserve regime is not central.
Affected population
- Affected units are banks, depositors, borrowers and the Exchequer.
- QE reserves are currently remunerated at Bank Rate.
- Bank profits and lending rates may adjust.
- Monetary-policy operations become more complex.
Gross impact
- Reform claimed about £35bn annual saving.
- Central case uses £15bn gross feasible saving.
- Bank-tax and credit offsets reduce this to £10bn.
- High case allows market costs to exceed savings.
Fiscal build-up, central case
- Gross reserve-interest saving: -£15.0bn
- Lower bank tax receipts: +£2.5bn
- Higher financing and implementation risk: +£2.0bn
- Administration and compensation: +£0.5bn
Central net impact: -£10.0bn in 2027-28.
Behaviour and pass-through
- Low case assumes carefully designed tiering and limited market reaction.
- Central case assumes partial pass-through and bank-tax offsets.
- High case assumes credibility costs raise wider financing costs.
- The saving varies strongly with Bank Rate.
Phasing
- 2026-27: -£2.0bn. Preparation or partial implementation.
- 2027-28: -£10.0bn. Main scenario year.
- 2028-29: -£12.0bn. Behaviour and pass-through develop.
- 2029-30: -£10.0bn. Steady-state uncertainty persists.
Main source groups
- Office for Budget Responsibility, "A brief guide to the public finances" (2026): The OBR expects public receipts of about £1,235bn in 2025-26; scale check for large packages.
- Reform UK, "Our Contract with You" (2024): The Contract claims large savings from departments, QE reserves, aid, welfare and net zero; defines scenarios but needs caution.
- House of Commons Library, "Central bank reserves and government's debt interest" (2026): Used to size the affected population, baseline economic quantities and sectoral exposure.
- Office for Budget Responsibility, "The fiscal impact of quantitative easing and quantitative tightening" (2023): Used for the macro-fiscal baseline, receipts and spending context, and relevant behavioural assumptions.
- Hall and Reis, "Maintaining Central-Bank Financial Stability under New-Style Central Banking" (NBER Working Paper, 2015): Interest-paying reserves and central-bank assets create fiscal and solvency risks under new-style central banking; relevant to reserve-interest payments and Treasury indemnity risks.
- Reis, "Funding Quantitative Easing to Target Inflation" (Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium, 2016): QE funding through central-bank liabilities matters for inflation control and balance-sheet transmission; warns against treating reserve-interest reform as a free fiscal saving.
- Reform UK, "Our Policies" (2026): Used to define the pledge wording, policy scope and implementation scenario being modelled.