PolicyLens

Methodology note

Fund 10,000 extra police: calculation note

Scenario assumptions behind the Fund 10,000 extra police estimate. The figures are illustrative and exclude unrelated Conservative pledges.

View main policy page: Fund 10,000 extra police

Central fiscal result

+£0.8bn - Net fiscal impact in 2028-29

Low case: +£0.7bn. High case: +£1.4bn. Positive numbers are fiscal costs or borrowing pressure. Negative numbers are Exchequer savings or receipts.

Scenario and baseline

  • Model £800m annual police funding by 2028-29.
  • Recruitment target is 10,000 officers.
  • Baseline policing budgets are unchanged otherwise.
  • Crime benefits are not scored as Exchequer savings.

Affected population

  • Affected population is police forces and residents in hotspot areas.
  • Direct count is 10,000 extra officers in the pledge.
  • Indirect exposure includes courts, prisons and local businesses.
  • Benefits depend on geographic deployment.

Gross impact

  • Central spending: £0.8bn from the party paper.
  • Training and setup are included within the high case.
  • Low case assumes slower recruitment in-year.
  • No automatic crime-cost saving is deducted.

Fiscal build-up, central case

  • Police recruitment and payroll: +£0.8bn
  • Training and equipment: +£0.1bn
  • Crime-related fiscal offsets: -£0.1bn
  • Administration: £0.0bn

Central net impact: +£0.8bn in 2028-29.

Behaviour and pass-through

  • Low case assumes slower ramp-up and some crime offsets.
  • Central case follows the £800m envelope.
  • High case assumes overtime, training and equipment overspend.
  • Hotspot targeting improves expected effectiveness.
  • Trust effects must be monitored, not assumed.

Phasing

  • 2026-27: +£0.2bn. Preparation or partial implementation.
  • 2027-28: +£0.6bn. Main ramp-up year.
  • 2028-29: +£0.8bn. Target-year central estimate.
  • 2029-30: +£0.8bn. Continuation at steady-state assumptions.

Main source groups

  • Conservative Party, "Take Back Our Streets" (2026): Used to define the pledge wording, policy scope and implementation scenario being modelled.
  • Home Office, "Police funding for England and Wales 2015 to 2026" (2025): Policing funding for England and Wales was up to £19.9bn in 2025-26; anchors the scale of an extra £800m policing package.
  • Home Office, "Police workforce, England and Wales: 31 March 2025" (2025): The Home Office records police officer numbers and workforce trends across England and Wales; relevant to recruitment capacity and baseline workforce questions.
  • Office for Budget Responsibility, "Economic and fiscal outlook: March 2026" (2026): The OBR forecast sets the macro, borrowing and receipts baseline used for broad fiscal context; prevents treating tax cuts or spending changes as self-financing.
  • Braga, Papachristos and Hureau, "The Effects of Hot Spots Policing on Crime" (Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2014): Hotspots policing reduced crime in many studies without simply displacing crime nearby; relevant to the crime-reduction claim for extra police patrols.
  • Sherman and Weisburd, "General Deterrent Effects of Police Patrol in Crime Hot Spots" (Justice Quarterly, 1995): Concentrating police patrols in crime hot spots reduced disorder and crime calls; supports targeted patrols more than general headcount rises.
  • Draca, Machin and Witt, "Panic on the Streets of London" (American Economic Review, 2011): A large police deployment in London reduced crime in targeted areas, showing deterrence effects; relevant to extra police and hotspot claims.
  • Conservative Party, "Our Plan for Britain" (2026): Used to define the pledge wording, policy scope and implementation scenario being modelled.