PolicyLens

Methodology note

Cap Plan 2 student-loan interest: calculation note

Scenario assumptions behind the Cap Plan 2 student-loan interest estimate. The figures are illustrative and exclude unrelated Conservative pledges.

View main policy page: Cap Plan 2 student-loan interest

Central fiscal result

+£2.0bn - Net fiscal impact in 2028-29

Low case: +£0.5bn. High case: +£5.0bn. Positive numbers are fiscal costs or borrowing pressure. Negative numbers are Exchequer savings or receipts.

Scenario and baseline

  • Model Plan 2 interest capped at RPI from 2028-29.
  • Central fiscal cost is £2bn annualised loan-impact equivalent.
  • Baseline includes DfE cap at 6 percent for 2026-27.
  • Plan 5 loans are not changed centrally.

Affected population

  • Affected population is borrowers with Plan 2 student loans.
  • Direct gains are larger for higher earners and larger balances.
  • Monthly repayments mostly do not change immediately.
  • Taxpayers bear lower eventual loan receipts.

Gross impact

  • Central cost: £2bn annualised loan-subsidy effect.
  • Low case assumes lower RPI and more write-offs anyway.
  • High case assumes high balances and higher graduate earnings.
  • No enrolment or productivity effect is booked.

Fiscal build-up, central case

  • Lower student-loan interest receipts: +£2.1bn
  • Higher graduate consumption receipts: -£0.1bn
  • Administration costs: £0.0bn
  • Accounting revaluation risk: £0.0bn

Central net impact: +£2.0bn in 2028-29.

Behaviour and pass-through

  • Low case assumes many balances are written off regardless.
  • Central case follows IFS distributional logic with moderate fiscal exposure.
  • High case assumes more borrowers repay enough to benefit.
  • Graduate labour supply effects are likely small.
  • Policy is not assumed to increase human capital.

Phasing

  • 2026-27: +£0.4bn. Preparation or partial implementation.
  • 2027-28: +£1.4bn. Main ramp-up year.
  • 2028-29: +£2.0bn. Target-year central estimate.
  • 2029-30: +£2.2bn. Continuation at steady-state assumptions.

Main source groups

  • Conservative Party, "Conservatives pledge to cut student loan interest" (2026): Used to define the pledge wording, policy scope and implementation scenario being modelled.
  • Department for Education, "Interest rate cap introduced to protect Plan 2 borrowers" (2026): The government capped Plan 2 and 3 interest at 6% for 2026-27 while standard terms use RPI-based rates; defines the current student-loan baseline.
  • Institute for Fiscal Studies, "Options for changing Plan 2 student loans" (2026): IFS says the Conservative Plan 2 proposal cuts balances for higher earners but not most monthly repayments immediately; used for distributional and fiscal caution.
  • Office for Budget Responsibility, "Economic and fiscal outlook: March 2026" (2026): The OBR forecast sets the macro, borrowing and receipts baseline used for broad fiscal context; prevents treating tax cuts or spending changes as self-financing.
  • Lochner and Monge-Naranjo, "Student Loans and Repayment: Theory, Evidence and Policy" (Handbook of the Economics of Education, 2016): Student-loan design affects insurance, repayment burdens and taxpayer exposure; relevant to capping Plan 2 interest.
  • Dynarski and Scott-Clayton, "Financial Aid Policy: Lessons from Research" (NBER, 2013): Student aid is most effective when simple and targeted; poorly targeted subsidies can have high fiscal cost; relevant to graduate loan-interest subsidies.
  • Conservative Party, "Our Plan for Britain" (2026): Used to define the pledge wording, policy scope and implementation scenario being modelled.