Methodology note
Remove basic tax for NHS staff: calculation note
Assumptions behind the Remove basic tax for NHS staff scenario. Implementation detail is incomplete, so uncertainty is explicit.
Central fiscal result
+£8.0bn - Net fiscal impact in 2027-28
Low case: +£4.0bn. High case: +£14.0bn. Positive numbers are fiscal costs or borrowing pressure. Negative numbers are Exchequer savings or receipts.
Scenario and baseline
- Eligible frontline NHS and social-care workers pay no basic-rate income tax.
- The relief lasts three years.
- Higher-rate tax above the basic band remains.
- Eligibility is narrower than all health and care employment.
Affected population
- Affected units are employee taxpayers in NHS and social care.
- NHS England HCHS headcount is about 1.54m.
- Adult social care has about 1.60m filled posts in England.
- Low-paid workers below tax thresholds gain less.
Gross impact
- Central case assumes about 2m eligible taxpayers after exclusions.
- Average tax relief is around £4,000 per eligible worker.
- Central cost is £8bn.
- Retention savings are not fiscal-scored.
Fiscal build-up, central case
- Income tax receipts lost: +£8.2bn
- Higher hours and retention receipts: -£0.3bn
- Administration and payroll changes: +£0.1bn
- Administration and uncertainty: +£0.0bn
Central net impact: +£8.0bn in 2027-28.
Behaviour and pass-through
- Low case assumes narrow eligibility and some retention benefit.
- Central case assumes broad frontline coverage and limited offset.
- High case includes agency staff, devolved spillovers and classification pressure.
- Tax relief does not train new workers quickly.
Phasing
- 2026-27: +£2.0bn. Preparation or partial implementation.
- 2027-28: +£8.0bn. Main scenario year.
- 2028-29: +£8.5bn. Behaviour and pass-through develop.
- 2029-30: +£8.5bn. Steady-state uncertainty persists.
Main source groups
- Propper, Burgess and Gossage, "Competition and Quality: Evidence from the NHS" (Economic Journal, 2008): NHS incentives can affect quality, so workforce policy should consider service performance as well as headcount; relevant to retention claims, though not a direct tax-relief study.
- NHS Digital, "NHS Workforce Statistics, August 2025" (2025): NHS England HCHS staff numbered about 1.54 million headcount in August 2025; anchors tax-relief exposure.
- Skills for Care, "State of the adult social care workforce 2025" (2025): Adult social care in England had about 1.60 million filled posts in 2024-25; anchors care-worker exposure.
- Reform UK, "Our Contract with You" (2024): Used to define the pledge wording, policy scope and implementation scenario being modelled.
- HM Revenue and Customs, "Direct effects of illustrative tax changes" (2026): Used to support the baseline, affected-population sizing or behavioural assumptions in the illustrative scenario.
- Saez, Slemrod and Giertz, "The Elasticity of Taxable Income" (Journal of Economic Literature, 2012): Tax changes can affect reported earnings, hours and avoidance through multiple margins; supports caution on labour-supply claims from targeted tax relief.
- Reform UK, "Our Policies" (2026): Used to define the pledge wording, policy scope and implementation scenario being modelled.