Methodology note
Reform aviation taxes: note
Models reform aviation taxes in 2028-29. The estimate is illustrative and excludes wider package interactions.
Central fiscal result
-GBP 2.8bn - Net fiscal impact in 2028-29
Low case: -GBP 5.0bn. High case: -GBP 0.7bn. Positive numbers are fiscal costs or borrowing pressure. Negative numbers are Exchequer savings or receipts.
Scenario and baseline
- Models reform aviation taxes by 2028-29.
- Baseline is current policy or published departmental plans.
- Central case uses published party or official anchors where available.
- Wider manifesto interactions are excluded unless stated.
Affected population
- Affected units are people, firms, households or providers depending on policy.
- Direct exposure follows the manifesto or government target group.
- Indirect exposure includes suppliers, workers, consumers and taxpayers.
- Weakest counts are widened in the low and high cases.
Gross impact
- Published anchor or scenario central is +GBP 2.8bn in 2028-29.
- Gross costs or receipts are adjusted for behaviour and delivery risk.
- Tax, benefit or procurement offsets are separated in the fiscal build-up.
- The range is deliberately wider where implementation detail is thin.
Fiscal build-up, central case
- Gross tax or receipt yield: -GBP 3.5bn
- Behavioural and avoidance response: +GBP 0.6bn
- Administration and compliance cost: +GBP 0.1bn
- Other tax-base interactions: +GBP 0.0bn
Central net impact: -GBP 2.8bn in 2028-29.
Behaviour and pass-through
- Low case assumes stronger delivery or receipts than central.
- Central case applies moderate behavioural leakage and pass-through.
- High case allows weaker delivery, larger take-up or higher costs.
- Output effects follow incidence, capacity and investment channels.
- Distributional gains do not automatically imply GDP gains.
Phasing
- 2026-27: -GBP 0.3bn. Phased implementation and take-up.
- 2027-28: -GBP 1.5bn. Phased implementation and take-up.
- 2028-29: -GBP 2.8bn. Phased implementation and take-up.
- 2029-30: -GBP 2.8bn. Phased implementation and take-up.
Main source groups
- S1: Liberal Democrats: source for scenario or evidence.
- S2: Liberal Democrats: source for scenario or evidence.
- S3: American Economic Journal: Economic Policy: source for scenario or evidence.
- S4: Journal of Urban Economics: source for scenario or evidence.