Methodology note
Allow asylum seekers to work: note
Models allow asylum seekers to work in 2028-29. The estimate is illustrative and excludes wider package interactions.
Central fiscal result
-£2.0bn - Net fiscal impact in 2028-29
Low case: -£4.5bn. High case: +£0.5bn. Positive numbers are fiscal costs or borrowing pressure. Negative numbers are Exchequer savings or receipts.
Scenario and baseline
- Models allow asylum seekers to work by 2028-29.
- Baseline is current policy or published departmental plans.
- Central case uses published party or official anchors where available.
- Wider manifesto interactions are excluded unless stated.
Affected population
- Affected units are people, firms, households or providers depending on policy.
- Direct exposure follows the manifesto or government target group.
- Indirect exposure includes suppliers, workers, consumers and taxpayers.
- Weakest counts are widened in the low and high cases.
Gross impact
- Published anchor or scenario central is +£2.0bn in 2028-29.
- Gross costs or receipts are adjusted for behaviour and delivery risk.
- Tax, benefit or procurement offsets are separated in the fiscal build-up.
- The range is deliberately wider where implementation detail is thin.
Fiscal build-up, central case
- Gross spending reduction: -£2.4bn
- Delivery and transition costs: +£0.3bn
- Administration and appeals: +£0.1bn
- Indirect service-pressure effects: +£0.0bn
Central net impact: -£2.0bn in 2028-29.
Behaviour and pass-through
- Low case assumes stronger delivery or receipts than central.
- Central case applies moderate behavioural leakage and pass-through.
- High case allows weaker delivery, larger take-up or higher costs.
- Output effects follow incidence, capacity and investment channels.
- Distributional gains do not automatically imply GDP gains.
Phasing
- 2026-27: -£0.2bn. Phased implementation and take-up.
- 2027-28: -£1.1bn. Phased implementation and take-up.
- 2028-29: -£2.0bn. Phased implementation and take-up.
- 2029-30: -£2.0bn. Phased implementation and take-up.
Main source groups
- Dustmann and Frattini, "The Fiscal Effects of Immigration to the UK" (Economic Journal, 2014): UK immigrants’ fiscal effects vary by cohort and skill, not just by migrant status; relevant to asylum work and labour-market policy.
- Liberal Democrats, "Funding a Fair Deal: Liberal Democrat Manifesto Costings" (2024): Party costings give 2028-29 spending, revenue and investment figures; used as starting anchors, not official costings.
- Manacorda, Manning and Wadsworth, "The Impact of Immigration on Wages" (Economic Journal, 2012): UK immigration affected wages unevenly, with stronger effects among some migrant groups; relevant to labour-market migration measures.
- Liberal Democrats, "For a Fair Deal: Liberal Democrat Manifesto 2024" (2024): The manifesto gives announced policy detail across health, care, housing, taxes and climate; used to define the policy scenarios.