PolicyLens

Methodology note

Apply VAT to private school fees: note

Models apply vat to private school fees in 2029-30. The estimate is illustrative and excludes wider package interactions.

View main policy page: Apply VAT to private school fees

Central fiscal result

-£1.7bn - Net fiscal impact in 2029-30

Low case: -£2.0bn. High case: -£0.8bn. Positive numbers are fiscal costs or borrowing pressure. Negative numbers are Exchequer savings or receipts.

Scenario and baseline

  • Models apply vat to private school fees by 2029-30.
  • Baseline is current policy or published departmental plans.
  • Central case uses published party or official anchors where available.
  • Wider manifesto interactions are excluded unless stated.

Affected population

  • Affected units are people, firms, households or providers depending on policy.
  • Direct exposure follows the manifesto or government target group.
  • Indirect exposure includes suppliers, workers, consumers and taxpayers.
  • Weakest counts are widened in the low and high cases.

Gross impact

  • Published anchor or scenario central is +£1.7bn in 2029-30.
  • Gross costs or receipts are adjusted for behaviour and delivery risk.
  • Tax, benefit or procurement offsets are separated in the fiscal build-up.
  • The range is deliberately wider where implementation detail is thin.

Fiscal build-up, central case

  • Gross tax or receipt yield: -£2.1bn
  • Behavioural and avoidance response: +£0.3bn
  • Administration and compliance cost: +£0.1bn
  • Other tax-base interactions: +£0.0bn

Central net impact: -£1.7bn in 2029-30.

Behaviour and pass-through

  • Low case assumes stronger delivery or receipts than central.
  • Central case applies moderate behavioural leakage and pass-through.
  • High case allows weaker delivery, larger take-up or higher costs.
  • Output effects follow incidence, capacity and investment channels.
  • Distributional gains do not automatically imply GDP gains.

Phasing

  • 2026-27: -£0.2bn. Phased implementation and take-up.
  • 2027-28: -£0.6bn. Phased implementation and take-up.
  • 2028-29: -£1.2bn. Phased implementation and take-up.
  • 2029-30: -£1.7bn. Phased implementation and take-up.

Main source groups

  • Benzarti, Carloni, Harju and Kosonen, "What Goes Up May Not Come Down" (Journal of Political Economy, 2020): VAT changes are not always passed through symmetrically to consumer prices; relevant to private-school and consumption-tax incidence.
  • HM Treasury, "Autumn Budget 2024 policy costings" (2024): Official policy costings show tax and spending impacts, including behavioural assumptions where published; used for implemented Labour tax measures.
  • Mirrlees and review team, "Tax by Design" (Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2011): Efficient tax systems should avoid narrow bases and poorly targeted reliefs that distort decisions; useful benchmark for judging tax-base changes and exemptions.
  • Office for Budget Responsibility, "Economic and fiscal outlook October 2024" (2024): The OBR assessed employer NICs, public investment and Budget-wide output and inflation effects; supports economic-impact and tax-incidence assumptions.
  • Labour Party, "Change: Labour Party Manifesto 2024" (2024): The manifesto sets the policy pledge, funding claim or target being modelled; used as the policy definition and manifesto baseline.