Methodology note
Create a £5,000 First Job Bonus: calculation note
Scenario assumptions behind the Create a £5,000 First Job Bonus estimate. The figures are illustrative and exclude unrelated Conservative pledges.
Central fiscal result
+£1.5bn - Net fiscal impact in 2028-29
Low case: +£0.5bn. High case: +£4.0bn. Positive numbers are fiscal costs or borrowing pressure. Negative numbers are Exchequer savings or receipts.
Scenario and baseline
- Model £5,000 payment for qualifying first-job entrants.
- Central case assumes 300,000 recipients in 2028-29.
- Baseline has no equivalent universal first-job payment.
- Excludes employer-side apprenticeship subsidies.
Affected population
- Affected population is young first-job entrants, not all employees.
- Central recipient count is 300,000; high case 800,000.
- Indirect exposure includes employers hiring young workers.
- Eligibility for students and part-time jobs is unspecified.
Gross impact
- Central cost: 300,000 recipients x £5,000 = £1.5bn.
- No tax offset is scored if payment is tax-free.
- Low case assumes tight targeting; high case broad eligibility.
- Employment additionality is described, not booked as saving.
Fiscal build-up, central case
- First Job Bonus payments: +£1.5bn
- Administration and fraud control: +£0.1bn
- Tax receipts from extra work: -£0.1bn
- Benefit savings from extra work: £0.0bn
Central net impact: +£1.5bn in 2028-29.
Behaviour and pass-through
- Low case assumes tight targeting and low take-up.
- Central case assumes 300,000 claims and limited additionality.
- High case assumes broad eligibility and high take-up.
- Sustained-employment conditions reduce fraud but delay support.
- No macro productivity gain is assumed.
Phasing
- 2026-27: +£0.3bn. Preparation or partial implementation.
- 2027-28: +£1.2bn. Main ramp-up year.
- 2028-29: +£1.5bn. Target-year central estimate.
- 2029-30: +£1.5bn. Continuation at steady-state assumptions.
Main source groups
- Conservative Party, "Conservatives pledge to cut student loan interest" (2026): Used to define the pledge wording, policy scope and implementation scenario being modelled.
- Office for Budget Responsibility, "Economic and fiscal outlook: March 2026" (2026): The OBR forecast sets the macro, borrowing and receipts baseline used for broad fiscal context; prevents treating tax cuts or spending changes as self-financing.
- Department for Education, "Apprenticeships, academic year 2025/26" (2026): Apprenticeship starts reached 226,620 in August-January 2025-26, with under-19s 23.6% of starts; anchors the scale of a 100,000-place expansion.
- Card, Kluve and Weber, "What Works? A Meta Analysis of Active Labor Market Program Evaluations" (Journal of the European Economic Association, 2018): Training and activation programmes vary widely; impacts are often stronger over medium horizons than immediately; relevant where savings rely on moving claimants into sustained work.
- Chetty, "Moral Hazard versus Liquidity and Optimal Unemployment Insurance" (Journal of Political Economy, 2008): Unemployment insurance affects job search through both liquidity support and work incentives; shows welfare cuts can raise search pressure but also remove useful income smoothing.
- Conservative Party, "Our Plan for Britain" (2026): Used to define the pledge wording, policy scope and implementation scenario being modelled.