Methodology note
Raise farming budget to GBP 3bn: calculation note
Assumptions behind the Raise farming budget to GBP 3bn scenario. Implementation detail is incomplete, so uncertainty is explicit.
Central fiscal result
+GBP 1.0bn - Net fiscal impact in 2027-28
Low case: +GBP 0.3bn. High case: +GBP 2.5bn. Positive numbers are fiscal costs or borrowing pressure. Negative numbers are Exchequer savings or receipts.
Scenario and baseline
- England farming budget rises to GBP 3bn.
- Climate-related farming subsidies are replaced or reduced.
- No separate food-price subsidy is included.
- Devolved consequentials are treated as high-case risk.
Affected population
- Affected units are farms, landowners, tenants and rural suppliers.
- England is the central geographic scope.
- Consumers are affected indirectly through supply and prices.
- Environmental public goods may lose funding.
Gross impact
- Budget rise from about GBP 2.4bn to GBP 3bn implies GBP 0.6bn.
- Central cost is GBP 1bn after transition and consequentials risk.
- Low case keeps many schemes within existing budgets.
- High case includes wider rural support demands.
Fiscal build-up, central case
- Direct budget uplift: +GBP 0.6bn
- Scheme transition and administration: +GBP 0.2bn
- Devolved or rural spillovers: +GBP 0.2bn
- Administration and uncertainty: +GBP 0.0bn
Central net impact: +GBP 1.0bn in 2027-28.
Behaviour and pass-through
- Low case assumes spending is largely reallocated within programmes.
- Central case assumes a real budget uplift and transition costs.
- High case assumes wider eligibility and devolved funding pressure.
- Food-price pass-through is not assumed.
Phasing
- 2026-27: +GBP 0.3bn. Preparation or partial implementation.
- 2027-28: +GBP 1.0bn. Main scenario year.
- 2028-29: +GBP 1.1bn. Behaviour and pass-through develop.
- 2029-30: +GBP 1.2bn. Steady-state uncertainty persists.
Main source groups
- S1: Reform Contract and farm reporting describe GBP 3bn target.
- S2: Defra blog gives recent farming-budget context.
- S3: Subsidy-incidence and multiplier studies inform land-rent and output-risk assumptions.
- S4: Environmental economics cautions against ignoring public goods.
- S5: Exact replacement scheme is not specified.