Methodology note
Abolish IR35 rules: calculation note
Assumptions behind the Abolish IR35 rules scenario. Implementation detail is incomplete, so uncertainty is explicit.
Central fiscal result
+£3.5bn - Net fiscal impact in 2027-28
Low case: +£1.0bn. High case: +£8.0bn. Positive numbers are fiscal costs or borrowing pressure. Negative numbers are Exchequer savings or receipts.
Scenario and baseline
- IR35 and off-payroll reforms are abolished.
- No replacement status test is modelled.
- Income tax and NI leakage are the main cost.
- Private compliance savings are not fiscal receipts.
Affected population
- Affected units are contractors, personal service companies and client firms.
- Professional services, IT and project work are most exposed.
- PAYE employees are indirectly affected through substitution risk.
- HMRC enforcement workload changes materially.
Gross impact
- Central cost assumes £3.5bn of annual tax leakage.
- Low case assumes only genuine contractors respond.
- High case assumes wider employment-to-contractor substitution.
- Compliance savings are economic, not fiscal.
Fiscal build-up, central case
- Income tax and NI leakage: +£3.8bn
- Corporation tax receipts on companies: -£0.4bn
- Administration saving: -£0.1bn
- Avoidance enforcement cost: +£0.2bn
Central net impact: +£3.5bn in 2027-28.
Behaviour and pass-through
- Low case assumes informal anti-avoidance remains effective.
- Central case assumes meaningful but contained incorporation response.
- High case assumes large relabelling of employment relationships.
- No productivity gain is counted as a fiscal offset.
Phasing
- 2026-27: +£0.7bn. Preparation or partial implementation.
- 2027-28: +£3.5bn. Main scenario year.
- 2028-29: +£4.5bn. Behaviour and pass-through develop.
- 2029-30: +£5.0bn. Steady-state uncertainty persists.
Main source groups
- Saez, Slemrod and Giertz, "The Elasticity of Taxable Income" (Journal of Economic Literature, 2012): Taxable-income elasticities include avoidance, income shifting and reporting responses, not only real work effort; relevant because IR35 directly concerns boundary-shifting between employment and contracting.
- HM Revenue and Customs, "Direct effects of illustrative tax changes" (2026): HMRC ready-reckoners show large revenue effects from income-tax, NI, VAT, fuel-duty and corporation-tax changes; primary fiscal scale anchor.
- Reform UK, "Our Contract with You" (2024): The Contract specifies thresholds, duties and business-tax proposals while claiming annual cost and saving totals; defines broad current tax pledges.
- Kleven, Knudsen, Kreiner, Pedersen and Saez, "Unwilling or Unable to Cheat? Evidence From a Tax Audit Experiment in Denmark" (Econometrica, 2011): Tax evasion is much lower where income is third-party reported than where income is self-reported; supports the revenue-risk case for anti-avoidance rules like IR35.
- Reform UK, "Our Policies" (2026): Used to define the pledge wording, policy scope and implementation scenario being modelled.