Methodology note
Abolish ILR and migrant benefits: calculation note
Assumptions behind the Abolish ILR and migrant benefits scenario. Implementation detail is incomplete, so uncertainty is explicit.
Central fiscal result
-GBP 3.0bn - Net fiscal impact in 2027-28
Low case: -GBP 10.0bn. High case: +GBP 7.0bn. Positive numbers are fiscal costs or borrowing pressure. Negative numbers are Exchequer savings or receipts.
Scenario and baseline
- Indefinite leave to remain is abolished or rescinded.
- Foreign nationals have no routine benefit access.
- Five-year renewable visas replace settlement.
- Retrospective legal failure is included in the high case.
Affected population
- Affected units are foreign nationals, employers and migrant households.
- Exposure depends on visa type, income, family status and duration.
- Employers face higher retention and recruitment risk.
- Public services face mixed demand and staffing effects.
Gross impact
- Central saving assumes some benefit and housing spending falls.
- Lost tax receipts from lower labour supply partly offset savings.
- Legal and administration costs are material.
- Lifetime claims are not converted mechanically into annual savings.
Fiscal build-up, central case
- Benefit and housing savings: -GBP 6.0bn
- Lower tax receipts from exits: +GBP 2.0bn
- Administration, appeals and litigation: +GBP 1.0bn
- Public-service staffing pressure: +GBP 0.0bn
Central net impact: -GBP 3.0bn in 2027-28.
Behaviour and pass-through
- Low case assumes high benefit savings and limited skilled-worker exit.
- Central case assumes meaningful labour-supply and tax-base loss.
- High case assumes legal delays, lower receipts and service staffing costs.
- Price effects rise in migrant-dependent sectors.
Phasing
- 2026-27: -GBP 0.5bn. Preparation or partial implementation.
- 2027-28: -GBP 3.0bn. Main scenario year.
- 2028-29: -GBP 4.0bn. Behaviour and pass-through develop.
- 2029-30: -GBP 5.0bn. Steady-state uncertainty persists.
Main source groups
- S1: Reform page states ILR abolition and no benefit access.
- S2: Boriswave paper gives Reform's lifetime fiscal claims.
- S3: UK immigration studies inform fiscal-contribution and labour-market caveats.
- S4: MAC evidence frames labour-market shortages.
- S5: No official UK impact assessment exists for this policy.